Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The second and third petitions are preferred by two readers of "Sakal" who also challenge the constitutionality of the Act. Certain parties were allowed to intervene. They supported the Union of India, the respondent, in all these petitions and sought to uphold the validity of the Act and the Order.
- Hamdard Dawakhana
PETITIONER: HAMDARD DAWAKHANA (WAKF) LAL KUAN,DELHI AND...
- Ramesh Thappar V. State of Madras
Supreme Court of India Romesh Thappar vs The State Of Madras...
- Hamdard Dawakhana
4 Ιουλ 2024 · In the 1962 case of Sakal Papers Ltd vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India examined the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and its 1960 Order, which regulated the pricing and page limits of newspapers to control advertising space.
Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. Union Of India Mudholkar, J.— A matter of far-reaching importance affecting the freedom of the press is raised in these three petitions wherein the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956, and the Daily Newspaper (Price and Page) Order, 1960, is questioned.
21 Φεβ 2023 · The case of ‘ Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (1961)’ is considered a landmark case on freedom of press in India. In this case, three petitions wherein the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956, and the Daily Newspaper (Price and Page) Order, 1960, was questioned.
5 Αυγ 2024 · sakal papers vs union of india Judgment. The Court ruled that the freedom of citizens to publish, distribute, and circulate information is part of their right to propagate their beliefs. Since citizens have the ability to spread information verbally or in writing, this right is encompassed within the right to freedom of speech and expression.
5 Απρ 2024 · In the Sakal Papers case, the Supreme Court of India struck down the provisions of the 1956 and 1960 Acts, holding them unconstitutional. This case marked a milestone in the development of constitutional law in India, specifically concerning the freedom of speech and expression.
Sakal Papers v. Union of India.' It is the analysis of this case, both because it raises some critical questions going into the very heart of the nature of free speech, as well as the clarity of the judgment, that shall constitute a major part of this paper. In Sakal, an order under Section 3 of the Newspaper Act of 1956 was
