Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Before turning to speciic sections of a U.S. Supreme Court brief, it’s worth recounting a few Court-speciic styles that cut across many sections. Don’t refer to the Court as “the Supreme Court,” as in “the Supreme Court has held that . . . .”
the Court is of interest to amicus FIRE because of the profound impact the case would have on the expressive rights of public university faculty. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The First Amendment bears a special relationship to the classroom, where academic freedom is essential to facilitating the marketplace of ideas.
briefs to the specifics of your case and use your own language. THESE FORMATS ARE ONLY AN ORGANIZATIONAL AND ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE, NOT A FORM TO BE SUBMITTED IN EACH CASE.
makes a good supreme court brief in any given case turns on so many variables—underlying facts, applicable substantive law, type of litigants, personalities and
People (Colorado) v. Nathan Hall. Colorado Supreme Court 2004. Procedural History: At a preliminary hearing, the trial court dismissed case for lack of probable cause (defendant won) District court affirmed lack of probable cause (defendant won again) Appellate court reversed (People won)
The most obvious way to accomplish that is to research the legal issue thoroughly, devise persuasive arguments, and craft a well-organized, well-reasoned, and engagingly written brief. That’s what you hope to prepare, of course, in every case regardless of the court; but it’s particularly expected in the Supreme Court.
federal courts of appeals to provide one “Statement of the Case” that includes the facts relevant to the issue(s) submitted for review, the procedural history of the case, and the disposition(s) of the lower court(s).
