Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
8 Αυγ 2024 · Our detection rates of CIN2 or higher and CIN3 or higher were significantly lower using ThinPrep compared with conventional cytology or SurePath, for two possible reasons. The first is the difference in sample preparation.
15 Οκτ 2021 · We were the first who compared CIN and cervical cancer detection rates between Surepath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology. Furthermore, we included more than 6 million primary smears, and we showed its effect in real practice instead of in a strictly controlled setting.
19 Ιουλ 2011 · In this comparison of ThinPrep and SurePath liquid-based cytology (LBC), both methods yielded similar validity in detecting significant cervical lesions. However, SurePath samples yielded higher rate...
ThinPrep® LBC was compared with SurePath® LBC using positive predictive value (PPV), atypical predictive value (APV) and total predictive value (TPV), reflecting outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse for high-grade dyskaryosis (PPV), low-grade dyskaryosis or borderline (atypical) cytology (APV) and all (total ...
1 Ιαν 2016 · Purpose: Within the last decade, SurePath and ThinPrep [both liquid-based cytology (LBC) tests] have replaced conventional cytology (CC) as primary test method in cervical cancer screening...
compared between SurePath and ThinPrep versus CC by logistic regression analyses (adjusted for age, screen region, socioeconomic status, and calendar time).
Within the last decade, SurePath and ThinPrep [both liquid-based cytology (LBC) tests] have replaced conventional cytology (CC) as primary test method in cervical cancer screening programs of multiple countries. The aim of our study was to examine the effect in the Dutch screening program.
