Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
17 Απρ 2021 · This paper identifies the core conceptual differences between traditional and critical theories of undergraduate peer mentorship and advances a grounded, critical framework for undergraduate...
- Login
This paper identifies the core conceptual differences...
- Help Center
© 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Terms;...
- Login
This essay is an attempt to bridge this gap. It will begin with an overview of the four primary frameworks that ground traditional undergraduate peer mentoring programs in the US, which are broadly based on developmental theories. It will then present critical mentoring as an alternative theoretical framework,
The four frameworks of traditional mentoring. Almost all undergraduate peer mentoring programs are grounded in one of four general mentoring frameworks (Smith, 2013, p. 56; Gershenfeld,...
17 Απρ 2021 · This paper identifies the core conceptual differences between traditional and critical theories of undergraduate peer mentorship and advances a grounded, critical framework for undergraduate peer mentoring.
16 Ιουλ 2019 · Traditional definitions of mentoring have been losing traction, with mentoring alternatives forging new possibilities within changing learning and work environments. Contexts of mentoring include a personal–professional relationship to an educational process; an organizational, cultural, and global context; and a systemic reform strategy that ...
e teacher mentoring involves a wide range of abilities, skills, attitudes, and perspectives. In a broader definition, Adams (2012) stated that mentoring is a nurturing process in which a more skilled person, serving as a role model, teaches, sponsors, encourages, counsels, and befriends.
Traditional definitions of mentoring assume a power differential inherent in mentoring relationships, and traditional mentoring is often depicted as a hierarchical relationship with the
