Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
TRANS-ASIA SHIPPING LINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ATTY. RENATO T. ARROYO, respondents. DAVIDE, JR., J.: As formulated by the petitioner, the issue in this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is as follows:
12 Ιουν 2024 · **Appeal and CA Decision**: Unsatisfied, Atty. Arroyo appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA-G.R. CV No. 39901). The CA reversed the trial court’s decision, finding Trans-Asia liable for moral and exemplary damages.
4 Μαρ 1996 · In this case, we are in full accord with the Court of Appeals that the petitioner failed to discharge this obligation. Before commencing the contracted voyage, the petitioner undertook some repairs on the cylinder head of one of the vessel's engines.
The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals decision, finding that both the Civil Code on common carriers and the Code of Commerce apply in cases of interrupted voyages that cause delays. Trans-Asia was found liable for failing to ensure passenger safety.
Trans-Asia Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free.
4 Μαρ 1996 · The Supreme Court found Trans-Asia Shipping Lines breached its duty as a common carrier by failing to ensure the vessel was seaworthy. As the carrier acted in bad faith, it was held liable for moral and exemplary damages, as well as actual damages for any financial losses suffered by passengers as a result of the delay.
TRANS-ASIA SHIPPING LINES, INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ATTY. RENATO T. ARROYO, respondents. THIRD DIVISION.
