Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Οκτ 2023 · William Twombly (plaintiff), representing a class of consumers, brought an antitrust claim against major telecommunications providers (ILECs) for alleged anticompetitive conduct in the local telephone and high-speed internet services markets.
William Twombly and Lawrence Marcus brought a class-action lawsuit alleging that Bell Atlantic and the Baby Bells (successor companies to the trust-busted AT&T) had engaged in anti-competitive behavior in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
15 Αυγ 2020 · Direct evidence in a Section 1 antitrust conspiracy means evidence that is explicit and requires no inferences to establish the conclusion that an agreement exists. In plain English, a “smoking gun” in the form of documents, meetings or defendants’ testimony.
Google's service, offered free of charge, instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages.
Plaintiffs, subscribers to local phone and internet services, sue Bell Atlantic and local telephone companies alleging violations of anti-trust laws, allowing each local phone company to monopolize its own market. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
Consumers with telephone and internet subscriptions brought an antitrust claim against local telephone companies, alleging that the companies had arranged not to compete with each other and had attempted to exclude potential competitors in a way that gave them a monopoly over the market.
The Twombly opinion put a greater burden on plaintiffs bringing antitrust claims to ensure that facts are included in the complaint that make the alleged conduct “plausible” in their case rather than merely conceivable under some undiscovered set of facts. However, the Court did not make
