Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Flexbeta has an interesting comparison between Vista 32-bit and Vista 64-bit edition. They tested installation time, integer processing, 2D graphics, memory speed, disk speed, 3D graphics and measured the PassMark rating.
Since 32-bit is still predominant in the Windows area, Vista x64 won't speed up your system in most cases. Here are some benchmark tests comparing Vista x64 and Vista x86: [1] [2] [3]. Memory: The 32 bit editions of Vista only support 4 GB RAM. With Vista x64, you can use up to 128 GB , if your hardware supports it.
You shouldn’t experience a difference with 32-bit apps. 64-bit video editing software might perform better under Vista x64, but only if it was optimized for 64-bit. As far I as I know, there are no differences between CPU types when it comes to 64-bit.
With the exception of Windows Vista Starter, all editions support both IA-32 (32-bit) and x64 (64-bit) processor architectures. [11] Microsoft ceased distribution of retail copies of Windows Vista in October 2010; OEM distribution of Windows Vista ended in October 2011. [12]
The difference between 32 bit and 64 bit is that 64 bit is way much faster, newer, and more secure than the Vista 32-bit processor. Apart from this, a 64-bit processing unit can handle more than 4 GB of RAM easily, whereas a 32 bit can handle only till 4 gb.
Key Difference: Vista 64-bit is an advanced version of 32-bit. The bits refer to the way a processor handles/sorts through data. A 64-bit processor is more capable of processing large amounts of data, compared to the 32-bit. The 32-bit has a 4GB RAM limitation, while a 64-bit does not.
Windows Vista 64-bit - Is it worth the upgrade? This explains the following: benefits & limitations introduced by 64-bit, what to consider when installing the 64-bit version, benchmark results and user experience changes.
