Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Appellant, a police officer, was subpoenaed by and appeared before a grand jury which was investigating alleged bribery and corruption of police officers, and was advised that the grand jury proposed to examine him concerning the performance of his official duties.
A case brief on the privilege against self-incrimination and its application to a police officer subpoenaed by a grand jury. The court held that the officer could not be dismissed for refusing to waive his constitutional right and that his testimony was sought for prosecution, not for an accounting of his duties.
A police officer was fired for refusing to sign a waiver of immunity before a grand jury. The Supreme Court ruled that the dismissal was unconstitutional and violated the privilege against self-incrimination.
Gardner v. Broderick. Media. Oral Argument - April 30, 1968; Opinions. Syllabus ; View Case ; Appellant Gardner . Appellee Broderick . Docket no. 635 ... by ideology << decision 1 of 1 >> Unanimous decision for Gardner majority opinion by Abe Fortas. John M. Harlan II Harlan. Hugo L. Black Black. William O. Douglas Douglas. Potter Stewart ...
7 Ιουν 2024 · Gardner v. Broderick, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al. Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York. No. 635. Argued: April 30, 1968. --- Decided: June 10, 1968.
U.S. Reports: Gardner v. Broderick, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., 392 U.S. 273 (1968). Names Fortas, Abe (Judge) Supreme Court of the United States (Author)
Gardner was a New York City policeman who refused to sign a waiver of immunity before a grand jury and was fired. The Supreme Court ruled that he could not be dismissed for exercising his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination.
